[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230307185811.GEZAeJQ8U+NYySH8up@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 19:58:11 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Takahiro Itazuri <itazur@...zon.com>,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
x86@...nel.org, zulinx86@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Propagate AMD-specific IBRS bits to guests
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 10:49:22AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> I don't see what such a rule buys us beyond complexity and, IMO, unnecessary
> maintenance burden. As Paolo pointed out, when there's an existing word, the
Maybe I wasn't clear enough - I don't mind existing words. What I mind
is adding new ones only for KVM's sake.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists