lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 21:11:04 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     "Torvalds, Linus" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
CC:     Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        "Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>,
        "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
        "babu.moger@....com" <babu.moger@....com>,
        "ananth.narayan@....com" <ananth.narayan@....com>,
        "vschneid@...hat.com" <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org" <linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: avoid compiler optimization in
 __resctrl_sched_in

> (a) it shouldn't define and declare a static function in a header file
>
>  (b) the resctrl_sched_in() inline function is midesigned to begin with

Fixing "b" would seem to be to just pass "next_p" to the function to
use instead of "current".

Can you expand about part "a" ... Linux has zillions of static inline functions
in header files to handle CONFIG options. One version is the real McCoy
while the other is just a stub for the CONFIG=n case.

What's different about this one?

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ