linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] Support defragmenting IPv(4|6) packets in BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQKK+a_0effQW5qBSq1AXoQOJg5-79q3d1NWJ2Vv8SHvOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:17:20 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] Support defragmenting IPv(4|6) packets in BPF

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 3:17 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
>
> > Have you considered to skb redirect to another netdev that does ip defrag?
> > Like macvlan does it under some conditions. This can be generalized.
>
> I had not considered that yet. Are you suggesting adding a new
> passthrough netdev thing that'll defrags? I looked at the macvlan driver
> and it looks like it defrags to handle some multicast corner case.

Something like that. A netdev that bpf prog can redirect too.
It will consume ip frags and eventually will produce reassembled skb.

The kernel ip_defrag logic has timeouts, counters, rhashtable
with thresholds, etc. All of them are per netns.
Just another ip_defrag_user will still share rhashtable
with its limits. The kernel can even do icmp_send().
ip_defrag is not a kfunc. It's a big block with plenty of kernel
wide side effects.
I really don't think we can alloc_skb, copy_skb, and ip_defrag it.
It messes with the stack too much.
It's also not clear to me when skb is reassembled and how bpf sees it.
"redirect into reassembling netdev" and attaching bpf prog to consume
that skb is much cleaner imo.
May be there are other ways to use ip_defrag, but certainly not like
synchronous api helper.