linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: axis-fifo: alignment should match opening parenthesis in axis-fifo.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78d1ea82-ef18-42b2-8a8e-27ee3c7ad55f@kili.mountain>
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 11:02:55 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc:     Khadija <kamrankhadijadj@...il.com>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: axis-fifo: alignment should match opening
 parenthesis in axis-fifo.c

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 08:49:55AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Khadija wrote:
> 
> > Hey Julia! Thank you for the feedback. I will make the following changes and
> > resend the patch:
> > 1. Correct the patch description that is right under the subject line (make
> > it precise and imperative) and make sure that it does not have more than 70
> > characters per line.
> > 2. Adjust all the arguments of wait_event_interruptible_timeout so that they
> > are lined up. All of them should begin right under ( .
> 
> The problem here is that the ( is really far to the right.  My opinion is
> that the position of the second argument (ie the first one that is on a
> line of its own) is ok in this case.  So you can leave that one where it
> is and line up the other one.
> 

I kind of like lining things up like this.  I think if you can't align
things with the parens, then it's nice to at least use two tabs.  It's
not kernel style or anyone's style explicitly, but I kind of like it.

It doesn't make checkpatch happy.

I guess I probably wouldn't bother sending this patch.  To controversial.
I'd just move on to something else.  It's not like there is a shortage
of stuff to do.  One idea in this file is that you could use
sysfs_emit() in sysfs_read() and get rid of char tmp[32]; buffer.

regards,
dan carpenter

diff --git a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
index dfd2b357f484..0bf180cf44a6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
@@ -383,10 +383,10 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
 		 */
 		mutex_lock(&fifo->read_lock);
 		ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fifo->read_queue,
-			ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_RDFO_OFFSET),
-				 (read_timeout >= 0) ?
-				  msecs_to_jiffies(read_timeout) :
-				  MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+				ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_RDFO_OFFSET),
+				(read_timeout >= 0) ?
+					msecs_to_jiffies(read_timeout) :
+					MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
 
 		if (ret <= 0) {
 			if (ret == 0) {