linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] radi10: fix leak of 'r10bio->remaining' for recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230307022739.2656920-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Tue,  7 Mar 2023 10:27:39 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To:     song@...nel.org, neilb@...e.de
Cc:     linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yukuai3@...wei.com, yukuai1@...weicloud.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
        yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH -next] radi10: fix leak of 'r10bio->remaining' for recovery

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>

raid10_sync_request() will add 'r10bio->remaining' for both rdev and
replacement rdev. However, if the read io failed,
recovery_request_write() will return without issuring the write io, in
this case, end_sync_request() is only called once and 'remaining' is
leaked, which will cause io hang.

Fix the probleming by decreasing 'remaining' according to if 'bio' and
'repl_bio' is valid.

Fixes: 24afd80d99f8 ("md/raid10: handle recovery of replacement devices.")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index a8b5fecef136..f7002a1aa9cf 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -2611,11 +2611,22 @@ static void recovery_request_write(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio)
 {
 	struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private;
 	int d;
-	struct bio *wbio, *wbio2;
+	struct bio *wbio = r10_bio->devs[1].bio;
+	struct bio *wbio2 = r10_bio->devs[1].repl_bio;
+
+	/* Need to test wbio2->bi_end_io before we call
+	 * submit_bio_noacct as if the former is NULL,
+	 * the latter is free to free wbio2.
+	 */
+	if (wbio2 && !wbio2->bi_end_io)
+		wbio2 = NULL;
 
 	if (!test_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state)) {
 		fix_recovery_read_error(r10_bio);
-		end_sync_request(r10_bio);
+		if (wbio->bi_end_io)
+			end_sync_request(r10_bio);
+		if (wbio2)
+			end_sync_request(r10_bio);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -2624,14 +2635,6 @@ static void recovery_request_write(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio)
 	 * and submit the write request
 	 */
 	d = r10_bio->devs[1].devnum;
-	wbio = r10_bio->devs[1].bio;
-	wbio2 = r10_bio->devs[1].repl_bio;
-	/* Need to test wbio2->bi_end_io before we call
-	 * submit_bio_noacct as if the former is NULL,
-	 * the latter is free to free wbio2.
-	 */
-	if (wbio2 && !wbio2->bi_end_io)
-		wbio2 = NULL;
 	if (wbio->bi_end_io) {
 		atomic_inc(&conf->mirrors[d].rdev->nr_pending);
 		md_sync_acct(conf->mirrors[d].rdev->bdev, bio_sectors(wbio));
-- 
2.31.1