lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 11:47:27 +0000
From:   Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To:     "Mahapatra, Amit Kumar" <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        "richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
        "vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
        "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "pratyush@...nel.org" <pratyush@...nel.org>
Cc:     "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 09/15] spi: Add stacked and parallel memories support
 in SPI core



On 3/7/23 11:37, Mahapatra, Amit Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 9:51 AM
>> To: Mahapatra, Amit Kumar <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>;
>> broonie@...nel.org; miquel.raynal@...tlin.com; richard@....at;
>> vigneshr@...com; jic23@...nel.org; pratyush@...nel.org
>> Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 09/15] spi: Add stacked and parallel memories
>> support in SPI core
>>
>> There were too many recipients in To and Cc and I couldn't reply to the
>> email. I whipped off the Cc filed and most of the people from To and added
>> the lists in Cc.
>>
>> On 3/6/23 17:21, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:	
>>> Multi CS support using GPIO is not tested due to unavailability of
>>> necessary hardware setup.
>>
>> Please don't add code that is not used or tested.
> 
> During our discussion on the RFC, Mark had suggested to add multi-cs support
> via GPIO as well. We had agreed to add multi-cs support via GPIO, but had also
> mentioned that we don't have a hardware setup to test the CS GPIO use case.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/BN7PR12MB2802E2A9079E505932832270DC979@BN7PR12MB2802.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/
> 

Ok, his call then.
Cheers.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ