lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 17:32:48 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     "Zhuo, Qingqing (Lillian)" <Qingqing.Zhuo@....com>
Cc:     "Mahfooz, Hamza" <Hamza.Mahfooz@....com>,
        "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/vc4: Fix build error with undefined label

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:27:01PM +0000, Zhuo, Qingqing (Lillian) wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 11:11:22AM -0500, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> > + vc4 maintainers
> > 
> > On 3/8/23 04:34, Qingqing Zhuo wrote:
> > > [Why]
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c: In function ‘vc4_hdmi_bind’:
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:3448:17: error: label 
> > > ‘err_disable_runtime_pm’ used but not defined
> > > 
> > > [How]
> > > update err_disable_runtime_pm to err_put_runtime_pm.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@....com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c index 9e145690c480..edf882360d24 
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> > > @@ -3445,7 +3445,7 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
> > >   	 */
> > >   	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> > >   	if (ret)
> > > -		goto err_disable_runtime_pm;
> > > +		goto err_put_runtime_pm;
> > >   	if ((of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "brcm,bcm2711-hdmi0") ||
> > >   	     of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "brcm,bcm2711-hdmi1")) 
> > > &&
> 
> > The current drm-misc-next branch doesn't have that context at all. What tree is this based on?
>
> This is for amd-staging-drm-next.

I don't get it, why is there a vc4 patch in an AMD tree?

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ