[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5c9b925-57ac-eeab-6258-0ff9fed16af7@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 19:13:56 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-mips <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-power <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add PTE pointer parameter to
flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault()
On 06.03.23 17:15, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> s390 can do more fine-grained handling of spurious TLB protection faults,
> when there also is the PTE pointer available.
>
> Therefore, pass on the PTE pointer to flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault() as
> an additional parameter.
>
> This will add no functional change to other architectures, but those with
> private flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault() implementations need to be made
> aware of the new parameter.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists