[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAjphWYHDoDw9sQS@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:01:09 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, arnd@...db.de, mpe@...erman.id.au,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, hch@...radead.org,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] video: fbdev: atyfb: only use ioremap_uc() on
i386 and ia64
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 09:07:07PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> ioremap_uc() is only meaningful on old x86-32 systems with the PAT
> extension, and on ia64 with its slightly unconventional ioremap()
> behavior, everywhere else this is the same as ioremap() anyway.
>
> Change the only driver that still references ioremap_uc() to only do so
> on x86-32/ia64 in order to allow removing that interface at some
> point in the future for the other architectures.
>
> On some architectures, ioremap_uc() just returns NULL, changing
> the driver to call ioremap() means that they now have a chance
> of working correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> Cc: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Is anyone using this driver these days? How often do fbdev drivers get
audited to see what can be nuked?
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists