[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230308154111.483a686f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:41:11 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
Midas Chien <midaschieh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Revert pmsg_lock back to a normal mutex
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:04:23 -0800
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com> wrote:
> I'm interested in continuing to see if we can further tweak it, but
> I've got some other work I need to focus on, so I think I'm going to
> advocate for the revert in the short-term and look at finer grained
> locking (along with rtmutex to address the priority inversion issue)
> in the longer term.
Yeah, I would suggest the same. I would still like to see what the
difference is. Because I believe this will also be an issue for PREEMPT_RT.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists