lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 00:19:38 +0300
From:   Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
        William Dean <williamsukatube@...il.com>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
        Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/20] dt-bindings: pinctrl: ralink: {mt7620,mt7621}:
 rename to mediatek

On 9.03.2023 00:05, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 03:28:38AM +0300, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
>>
>> This platform from Ralink was acquired by MediaTek in 2011. Then, MediaTek
>> introduced these SoCs which utilise this platform. Rename the schemas to
>> mediatek to address the incorrect naming.
> 
> I said we don't do renames due to acquistions, you said that wasn't the
> reason, but then that's your reasoning here.

It's not a marketing/acquistion rename as the name of these SoCs were 
wrong from the get go. The information on the first sentence is to give 
the idea of why these SoCs were wrongfully named as the base platform 
that these new MediaTek SoCs share code with was called Ralink.

> 
> To give you another example, *new* i.MX things are still called
> 'fsl,imx...' and it has been how many years since merging with NXP?

Ok this is a point I see now. Though, I fail to see how this is called 
renaming when there's only new SoCs (from NXP in this case) to be added.

Arınç

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ