lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230308230001.GF31765@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 01:00:01 +0200
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg2l-smarc: Add OV5645 node

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 08:27:19PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Prabhakar,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:57 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > OV5645 sensor can be connected to the CN1 connector on the
> > carrier board. This patch adds the ov5645 node under i2c0 node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2-smarc.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2-smarc.dts
> > @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@
> >   */
> >
> >  /dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +/* comment the #define statement if OV5645 is not connected to CN1  */
> > +#define CAM_INTERFACE_OV5645   1
> 
> I believe the camera is optional ("can be connector" above).
> So shouldn't this be commented out by default?

Even better, could you turn this into a DT overlay ?

> The rest LGTM, so with the above sorted out:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ