[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeT=FxJsY5NF8Bq5cAfm-Jc=Ln3CnDJYey49_TTLqQKvS+UNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 20:44:01 -0800
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH 16/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Extend the vCPU
migration test to multi-vCPUs
Hi Raghu,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 5:07 PM Raghavendra Rao Ananta
<rananta@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> To test KVM's handling of multiple vCPU contexts together, that are
> frequently migrating across random pCPUs in the system, extend the test
> to create a VM with multiple vCPUs and validate the behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c | 166 ++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c
> index 239fc7e06b3b9..c9d8e5f9a22ab 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c
> @@ -19,11 +19,12 @@
> * higher exception levels (EL2, EL3). Verify this functionality by
> * configuring and trying to count the events for EL2 in the guest.
> *
> - * 4. Since the PMU registers are per-cpu, stress KVM by frequently
> - * migrating the guest vCPU to random pCPUs in the system, and check
> - * if the vPMU is still behaving as expected. The sub-tests include
> - * testing basic functionalities such as basic counters behavior,
> - * overflow, overflow interrupts, and chained events.
> + * 4. Since the PMU registers are per-cpu, stress KVM by creating a
> + * multi-vCPU VM, then frequently migrate the guest vCPUs to random
> + * pCPUs in the system, and check if the vPMU is still behaving as
> + * expected. The sub-tests include testing basic functionalities such
> + * as basic counters behavior, overflow, overflow interrupts, and
> + * chained events.
> *
> * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
> *
> @@ -348,19 +349,22 @@ struct guest_irq_data {
> struct spinlock lock;
> };
>
> -static struct guest_irq_data guest_irq_data;
> +static struct guest_irq_data guest_irq_data[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
>
> #define VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_ITERS_DEF 1000
> #define VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_MIGRATION_FREQ_MS 2
> +#define VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_NR_VPUS_DEF 2
>
> struct test_args {
> int vcpu_migration_test_iter;
> int vcpu_migration_test_migrate_freq_ms;
> + int vcpu_migration_test_nr_vcpus;
> };
>
> static struct test_args test_args = {
> .vcpu_migration_test_iter = VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_ITERS_DEF,
> .vcpu_migration_test_migrate_freq_ms = VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_MIGRATION_FREQ_MS,
> + .vcpu_migration_test_nr_vcpus = VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_NR_VPUS_DEF,
> };
>
> static void guest_sync_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
> @@ -396,26 +400,34 @@ static void guest_validate_irq(int pmc_idx, uint32_t pmovsclr, uint32_t pmc_idx_
> }
> }
>
> +static struct guest_irq_data *get_irq_data(void)
> +{
> + uint32_t cpu = guest_get_vcpuid();
> +
> + return &guest_irq_data[cpu];
> +}
> +
> static void guest_irq_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
> {
> uint32_t pmc_idx_bmap;
> uint64_t i, pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n();
> uint32_t pmovsclr = read_pmovsclr();
> unsigned int intid = gic_get_and_ack_irq();
> + struct guest_irq_data *irq_data = get_irq_data();
>
> /* No other IRQ apart from the PMU IRQ is expected */
> GUEST_ASSERT_1(intid == PMU_IRQ, intid);
>
> - spin_lock(&guest_irq_data.lock);
> - pmc_idx_bmap = READ_ONCE(guest_irq_data.pmc_idx_bmap);
> + spin_lock(&irq_data->lock);
> + pmc_idx_bmap = READ_ONCE(irq_data->pmc_idx_bmap);
>
> for (i = 0; i < pmcr_n; i++)
> guest_validate_irq(i, pmovsclr, pmc_idx_bmap);
> guest_validate_irq(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_COUNTER_IDX, pmovsclr, pmc_idx_bmap);
>
> /* Mark IRQ as recived for the corresponding PMCs */
> - WRITE_ONCE(guest_irq_data.irq_received_bmap, pmovsclr);
> - spin_unlock(&guest_irq_data.lock);
> + WRITE_ONCE(irq_data->irq_received_bmap, pmovsclr);
> + spin_unlock(&irq_data->lock);
>
> gic_set_eoi(intid);
> }
> @@ -423,35 +435,40 @@ static void guest_irq_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
> static int pmu_irq_received(int pmc_idx)
> {
> bool irq_received;
> + struct guest_irq_data *irq_data = get_irq_data();
>
> - spin_lock(&guest_irq_data.lock);
> - irq_received = READ_ONCE(guest_irq_data.irq_received_bmap) & BIT(pmc_idx);
> - WRITE_ONCE(guest_irq_data.irq_received_bmap, guest_irq_data.pmc_idx_bmap & ~BIT(pmc_idx));
> - spin_unlock(&guest_irq_data.lock);
> + spin_lock(&irq_data->lock);
> + irq_received = READ_ONCE(irq_data->irq_received_bmap) & BIT(pmc_idx);
> + WRITE_ONCE(irq_data->irq_received_bmap, irq_data->pmc_idx_bmap & ~BIT(pmc_idx));
> + spin_unlock(&irq_data->lock);
>
> return irq_received;
> }
>
> static void pmu_irq_init(int pmc_idx)
> {
> + struct guest_irq_data *irq_data = get_irq_data();
> +
> write_pmovsclr(BIT(pmc_idx));
>
> - spin_lock(&guest_irq_data.lock);
> - WRITE_ONCE(guest_irq_data.irq_received_bmap, guest_irq_data.pmc_idx_bmap & ~BIT(pmc_idx));
> - WRITE_ONCE(guest_irq_data.pmc_idx_bmap, guest_irq_data.pmc_idx_bmap | BIT(pmc_idx));
> - spin_unlock(&guest_irq_data.lock);
> + spin_lock(&irq_data->lock);
> + WRITE_ONCE(irq_data->irq_received_bmap, irq_data->pmc_idx_bmap & ~BIT(pmc_idx));
> + WRITE_ONCE(irq_data->pmc_idx_bmap, irq_data->pmc_idx_bmap | BIT(pmc_idx));
> + spin_unlock(&irq_data->lock);
>
> enable_irq(pmc_idx);
> }
>
> static void pmu_irq_exit(int pmc_idx)
> {
> + struct guest_irq_data *irq_data = get_irq_data();
> +
> write_pmovsclr(BIT(pmc_idx));
>
> - spin_lock(&guest_irq_data.lock);
> - WRITE_ONCE(guest_irq_data.irq_received_bmap, guest_irq_data.pmc_idx_bmap & ~BIT(pmc_idx));
> - WRITE_ONCE(guest_irq_data.pmc_idx_bmap, guest_irq_data.pmc_idx_bmap & ~BIT(pmc_idx));
> - spin_unlock(&guest_irq_data.lock);
> + spin_lock(&irq_data->lock);
> + WRITE_ONCE(irq_data->irq_received_bmap, irq_data->pmc_idx_bmap & ~BIT(pmc_idx));
> + WRITE_ONCE(irq_data->pmc_idx_bmap, irq_data->pmc_idx_bmap & ~BIT(pmc_idx));
> + spin_unlock(&irq_data->lock);
>
> disable_irq(pmc_idx);
> }
> @@ -783,7 +800,8 @@ static void test_event_count(uint64_t event, int pmc_idx, bool expect_count)
> static void test_basic_pmu_functionality(void)
> {
> local_irq_disable();
> - gic_init(GIC_V3, 1, (void *)GICD_BASE_GPA, (void *)GICR_BASE_GPA);
> + gic_init(GIC_V3, test_args.vcpu_migration_test_nr_vcpus,
> + (void *)GICD_BASE_GPA, (void *)GICR_BASE_GPA);
> gic_irq_enable(PMU_IRQ);
> local_irq_enable();
>
> @@ -1093,11 +1111,13 @@ static void guest_evtype_filter_test(void)
>
> static void guest_vcpu_migration_test(void)
> {
> + int iter = test_args.vcpu_migration_test_iter;
> +
> /*
> * While the userspace continuously migrates this vCPU to random pCPUs,
> * run basic PMU functionalities and verify the results.
> */
> - while (test_args.vcpu_migration_test_iter--)
> + while (iter--)
> test_basic_pmu_functionality();
> }
>
> @@ -1472,17 +1492,23 @@ static void run_kvm_evtype_filter_test(void)
>
> struct vcpu_migrate_data {
> struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm;
> - pthread_t *pt_vcpu;
> - bool vcpu_done;
> + pthread_t *pt_vcpus;
> + unsigned long *vcpu_done_map;
> + pthread_mutex_t vcpu_done_map_lock;
> };
>
> +struct vcpu_migrate_data migrate_data;
> +
> static void *run_vcpus_migrate_test_func(void *arg)
> {
> - struct vcpu_migrate_data *migrate_data = arg;
> - struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm = migrate_data->vpmu_vm;
> + struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm = migrate_data.vpmu_vm;
> + unsigned int vcpu_idx = (unsigned long)arg;
>
> - run_vcpu(vpmu_vm->vcpus[0]);
> - migrate_data->vcpu_done = true;
> + run_vcpu(vpmu_vm->vcpus[vcpu_idx]);
> +
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&migrate_data.vcpu_done_map_lock);
> + __set_bit(vcpu_idx, migrate_data.vcpu_done_map);
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&migrate_data.vcpu_done_map_lock);
>
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -1504,7 +1530,7 @@ static uint32_t get_pcpu(void)
> return pcpu;
> }
>
> -static int migrate_vcpu(struct vcpu_migrate_data *migrate_data)
> +static int migrate_vcpu(int vcpu_idx)
> {
> int ret;
> cpu_set_t cpuset;
> @@ -1513,9 +1539,9 @@ static int migrate_vcpu(struct vcpu_migrate_data *migrate_data)
> CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
> CPU_SET(new_pcpu, &cpuset);
>
> - pr_debug("Migrating vCPU to pCPU: %u\n", new_pcpu);
> + pr_debug("Migrating vCPU %d to pCPU: %u\n", vcpu_idx, new_pcpu);
>
> - ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(*migrate_data->pt_vcpu, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset);
> + ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(migrate_data.pt_vcpus[vcpu_idx], sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset);
>
> /* Allow the error where the vCPU thread is already finished */
> TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0 || ret == ESRCH,
> @@ -1526,48 +1552,74 @@ static int migrate_vcpu(struct vcpu_migrate_data *migrate_data)
>
> static void *vcpus_migrate_func(void *arg)
> {
> - struct vcpu_migrate_data *migrate_data = arg;
> + struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm = migrate_data.vpmu_vm;
> + int i, n_done, nr_vcpus = vpmu_vm->nr_vcpus;
> + bool vcpu_done;
>
> - while (!migrate_data->vcpu_done) {
> + do {
> usleep(msecs_to_usecs(test_args.vcpu_migration_test_migrate_freq_ms));
> - migrate_vcpu(migrate_data);
> - }
> + for (n_done = 0, i = 0; i < nr_vcpus; i++) {
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&migrate_data.vcpu_done_map_lock);
> + vcpu_done = test_bit(i, migrate_data.vcpu_done_map);
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&migrate_data.vcpu_done_map_lock);
Do we need to hold the lock here ?
> +
> + if (vcpu_done) {
> + n_done++;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + migrate_vcpu(i);
> + }
> +
> + } while (nr_vcpus != n_done);
>
> return NULL;
> }
>
> static void run_vcpu_migration_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int i, nr_vcpus, ret;
> struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm;
> - pthread_t pt_vcpu, pt_sched;
> - struct vcpu_migrate_data migrate_data = {
> - .pt_vcpu = &pt_vcpu,
> - .vcpu_done = false,
> - };
> + pthread_t pt_sched, *pt_vcpus;
>
> __TEST_REQUIRE(get_nprocs() >= 2, "At least two pCPUs needed for vCPU migration test");
>
> guest_data.test_stage = TEST_STAGE_VCPU_MIGRATION;
> guest_data.expected_pmcr_n = pmcr_n;
>
> - migrate_data.vpmu_vm = vpmu_vm = create_vpmu_vm(1, guest_code, NULL);
> + nr_vcpus = test_args.vcpu_migration_test_nr_vcpus;
> +
> + migrate_data.vcpu_done_map = bitmap_zalloc(nr_vcpus);
> + TEST_ASSERT(migrate_data.vcpu_done_map, "Failed to create vCPU done bitmap");
> + pthread_mutex_init(&migrate_data.vcpu_done_map_lock, NULL);
> +
> + migrate_data.pt_vcpus = pt_vcpus = calloc(nr_vcpus, sizeof(*pt_vcpus));
> + TEST_ASSERT(pt_vcpus, "Failed to create vCPU thread pointers");
> +
> + migrate_data.vpmu_vm = vpmu_vm = create_vpmu_vm(nr_vcpus, guest_code, NULL);
>
> /* Initialize random number generation for migrating vCPUs to random pCPUs */
> srand(time(NULL));
>
> - /* Spawn a vCPU thread */
> - ret = pthread_create(&pt_vcpu, NULL, run_vcpus_migrate_test_func, &migrate_data);
> - TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Failed to create the vCPU thread");
> + /* Spawn vCPU threads */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_vcpus; i++) {
> + ret = pthread_create(&pt_vcpus[i], NULL,
> + run_vcpus_migrate_test_func, (void *)(unsigned long)i);
> + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Failed to create the vCPU thread: %d", i);
> + }
>
> /* Spawn a scheduler thread to force-migrate vCPUs to various pCPUs */
> - ret = pthread_create(&pt_sched, NULL, vcpus_migrate_func, &migrate_data);
> + ret = pthread_create(&pt_sched, NULL, vcpus_migrate_func, NULL);
> TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Failed to create the scheduler thread for migrating the vCPUs");
>
> pthread_join(pt_sched, NULL);
> - pthread_join(pt_vcpu, NULL);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_vcpus; i++)
> + pthread_join(pt_vcpus[i], NULL);
>
> destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm);
> + free(pt_vcpus);
> + bitmap_free(migrate_data.vcpu_done_map);
> }
>
> static void run_tests(uint64_t pmcr_n)
> @@ -1596,12 +1648,14 @@ static uint64_t get_pmcr_n_limit(void)
>
> static void print_help(char *name)
> {
> - pr_info("Usage: %s [-h] [-i vcpu_migration_test_iterations] [-m vcpu_migration_freq_ms]\n",
> - name);
> + pr_info("Usage: %s [-h] [-i vcpu_migration_test_iterations] [-m vcpu_migration_freq_ms]"
> + "[-n vcpu_migration_nr_vcpus]\n", name);
> pr_info("\t-i: Number of iterations of vCPU migrations test (default: %u)\n",
> VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_ITERS_DEF);
> pr_info("\t-m: Frequency (in ms) of vCPUs to migrate to different pCPU. (default: %u)\n",
> VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_MIGRATION_FREQ_MS);
> + pr_info("\t-n: Number of vCPUs for vCPU migrations test. (default: %u)\n",
> + VCPU_MIGRATIONS_TEST_NR_VPUS_DEF);
> pr_info("\t-h: print this help screen\n");
> }
>
> @@ -1609,7 +1663,7 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> int opt;
>
> - while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hi:m:")) != -1) {
> + while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hi:m:n:")) != -1) {
> switch (opt) {
> case 'i':
> test_args.vcpu_migration_test_iter =
> @@ -1619,6 +1673,14 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
> test_args.vcpu_migration_test_migrate_freq_ms =
> atoi_positive("vCPU migration frequency", optarg);
> break;
> + case 'n':
> + test_args.vcpu_migration_test_nr_vcpus =
> + atoi_positive("Nr vCPUs for vCPU migrations", optarg);
> + if (test_args.vcpu_migration_test_nr_vcpus > KVM_MAX_VCPUS) {
> + pr_info("Max allowed vCPUs: %u\n", KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
> + goto err;
> + }
> + break;
> case 'h':
> default:
> goto err;
> --
> 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog
>
>
Thanks,
Reiji
Powered by blists - more mailing lists