linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Allow #power-domain-cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 08:45:44 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
        agross@...nel.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Allow
 #power-domain-cells



On 8.03.2023 08:24, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 9:17 AM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> MPM provides a single genpd. Allow #power-domain-cells = <0>.
> 
> Indeed! It was missing from the initial submission.  Thanks for fixing it up!
> 
>>
>> Fixes: 54fc9851c0e0 ("dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Qualcomm MPM support")
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml     | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml
>> index 509d20c091af..4c470dc143e5 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml
>> @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ properties:
>>          - description: MPM pin number
>>          - description: GIC SPI number for the MPM pin
>>
>> +  '#power-domain-cells':
> 
> Should we add it to the "required" list and examples?
I was debating it.. it's definitely not *required*, as the
irqchip part works even without it and then on SoCs with MPM
but without PSCI the setup may be tricky..

About the example, both yes/no are okay for me

Konrad
> 
> Shawn
> 
>> +    const: 0
>> +
>>  required:
>>    - compatible
>>    - reg
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>