linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 28/41] x86: Introduce userspace API for shadow stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZAhjLAIm91rJ2Lpr@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 11:27:56 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        John Allen <john.allen@....com>, kcc@...gle.com,
        eranian@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org, jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com,
        dethoma@...rosoft.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com, christina.schimpe@...el.com,
        david@...hat.com, debug@...osinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 28/41] x86: Introduce userspace API for shadow stack

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 02:29:44PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Add three new arch_prctl() handles:
> 
>  - ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE/DISABLE enables or disables the specified
>    feature. Returns 0 on success or an error.

"... or a negative value on error."

>  - ARCH_SHSTK_LOCK prevents future disabling or enabling of the
>    specified feature. Returns 0 on success or an error

ditto.

What is the use case of the feature locking?

I'm under the simple assumption that once shstk is enabled for an app,
it remains so. I guess my question is rather, what's the use case for
enabling shadow stack and then disabling it later for an app...?

> The features are handled per-thread and inherited over fork(2)/clone(2),
> but reset on exec().
> 
> This is preparation patch. It does not implement any features.

That belongs under the "---" line I guess.

> Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
> Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@....com>
> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> [tweaked with feedback from tglx]
> Co-developed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> 
> ---
> v4:
>  - Remove references to CET and replace with shadow stack (Peterz)
> 
> v3:
>  - Move shstk.c Makefile changes earlier (Kees)
>  - Add #ifdef around features_locked and features (Kees)
>  - Encapsulate features reset earlier in reset_thread_features() so
>    features and features_locked are not referenced in code that would be
>    compiled !CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK. (Kees)
>  - Fix typo in commit log (Kees)
>  - Switch arch_prctl() numbers to avoid conflict with LAM
> 
> v2:
>  - Only allow one enable/disable per call (tglx)
>  - Return error code like a normal arch_prctl() (Alexander Potapenko)
>  - Make CET only (tglx)
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h  |  6 +++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h      | 21 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h |  6 +++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile          |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c      |  7 ++++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c           | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c

...

> +long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option, unsigned long features)
> +{
> +	if (option == ARCH_SHSTK_LOCK) {
> +		task->thread.features_locked |= features;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Don't allow via ptrace */
> +	if (task != current)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Do not allow to change locked features */
> +	if (features & task->thread.features_locked)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	/* Only support enabling/disabling one feature at a time. */
> +	if (hweight_long(features) > 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (option == ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE) {
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

{} braces left over from some previous version. Can go now.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette