linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg2l-smarc: Add OV5645 node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 11:08:04 +0000
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg2l-smarc: Add OV5645 node

Hi Geert.

Thank you for the review.

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 7:27 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:57 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > OV5645 sensor can be connected to the CN1 connector on the
> > carrier board. This patch adds the ov5645 node under i2c0 node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2-smarc.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2-smarc.dts
> > @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@
> >   */
> >
> >  /dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +/* comment the #define statement if OV5645 is not connected to CN1  */
> > +#define CAM_INTERFACE_OV5645   1
>
> I believe the camera is optional ("can be connector" above).
> So shouldn't this be commented out by default?
>
Yep, that makes sense.

Shall I send this change or will you be generous to do this while applying ;)

Cheers,
Prabhakar


> The rest LGTM, so with the above sorted out:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds