[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8551cc8-bd5b-a2e0-ca4d-39bcf96d83c3@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:56:17 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>, andersson@...nel.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, jaswinder.singh@...aro.org,
ben.levinsky@....com, shubhrajyoti.datta@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] mailbox: zynqmp: fix IPI isr handling
On 2/28/23 22:02, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> Multiple IPI channels are mapped to same interrupt handler.
> Current isr implementation handles only one channel per isr.
> Fix this behavior by checking isr status bit of all child
> mailbox nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c
> index e287ed7a92ce..b1498f6f06e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static irqreturn_t zynqmp_ipi_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> struct zynqmp_ipi_message *msg;
> u64 arg0, arg3;
> struct arm_smccc_res res;
> - int ret, i;
> + int ret, i, status = IRQ_NONE;
>
> (void)irq;
> arg0 = SMC_IPI_MAILBOX_STATUS_ENQUIRY;
> @@ -170,11 +170,11 @@ static irqreturn_t zynqmp_ipi_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> memcpy_fromio(msg->data, mchan->req_buf,
> msg->len);
> mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)msg);
> - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + status = IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> }
> }
> - return IRQ_NONE;
> + return status;
> }
>
> /**
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists