linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8540p-ride: correct name of remoteproc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 07:06:19 -0500
From:   Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     andersson@...nel.org, quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com, agross@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8540p-ride: correct name of
 remoteproc_nsp0 firmware

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/03/2023 00:23, Brian Masney wrote:
> > The cdsp.mbn firmware that's referenced in sa8540p-ride.dts is actually
> > named cdsp0.mbn in the deliverables from Qualcomm. Let's go ahead and
> > correct the name to match what's in Qualcomm's deliverable.
> 
> I don't think vendor deliverables matter. linux-firmware is here more
> important. The file will be cdsp.mbn in the firmware, won't it?

cdsp0.mbn and cdsp1.mbn for the sa8540p are not in linux-firmware and I
far as I know there's no plan for someone to submit those since QC would
need to approve that. I can ask though since the DTS for these two bits
has been submitted upstream.

Brian