[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48d0217d-283f-354b-fcb5-12801895376a@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:32:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: dev@...henker.ch, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/25] arm64: dts: colibri-imx8x: Sort properties
On 08/03/2023 14:29, Philippe Schenker wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 13:57 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Is this approved coding style for IMX DTS?
>
> How the ordering should be done is nowhere specifically documented (at
> least this is my current understanding).
> The ordering how I noted it is what we gathered from multiple feedback
> on mailinglist discussions.
>
> With that ordering I hope everyone is happy.
>
> Philippe
Yeah, but what if next developer next month re-orders all your nodes
again because he will use different coding style?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists