linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: ina2xx: add supply property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:38:35 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: ina2xx: add supply property

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:01:44PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> 8 березня 2023 р. 15:46:52 GMT+02:00, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> написав(-ла):

> >If there are devices that work without any source of power at all that
> >would be very surprising.  It doesn't matter if a particular system has
> >a non-controllable regulator, the binding should still make it mandatory
> >to describe that.

> Then question is WHY and WHO passed driver without power supply system implemented? Why it pops only now?

You are defining a supply property.  When you define a supply property
that supply property should be mandatory if it's physically mandatory
for the device.

Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
substantially less than 80 columns.  Doing this makes your messages much
easier to read and reply to.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)