[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93b5c8bb6ec2010792c117bc7ffad9692fdf063c.camel@pschenker.ch>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:50:05 +0100
From: Philippe Schenker <dev@...henker.ch>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/25] arm64: dts: colibri-imx8x: Sort properties
On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 15:32 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/03/2023 14:29, Philippe Schenker wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 13:57 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > Is this approved coding style for IMX DTS?
> >
> > How the ordering should be done is nowhere specifically documented
> > (at
> > least this is my current understanding).
> > The ordering how I noted it is what we gathered from multiple
> > feedback
> > on mailinglist discussions.
> >
> > With that ordering I hope everyone is happy.
> >
> > Philippe
>
> Yeah, but what if next developer next month re-orders all your nodes
> again because he will use different coding style?
Someone from Toradex will complain that we want to have it the way I
sent now, since this is the way we agreed on internally.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists