linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Clarify description of returned value in some functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 15:46:06 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Clarify description of returned
 value in some functions

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:16:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:33 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Some of the functions do not provide Return: section on absence of which
> > kernel-doc complains. Besides that several functions return the fwnode
> > handle with incremented reference count. Add a respective note to make sure
> > that the caller decrements it when it's not needed anymore.
> >
> > While at it, unify the style of the Return: sections.
> >
> > Reported-by: Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> 
> or please let me know if I need to pick it up.

I can take it, thanks.

greg k-h