[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ttyu54wy.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 16:18:53 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Jordan Crouse <jorcrous@...zon.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetb@...hat.com>
Cc: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Albert Esteve <aesteve@...hat.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: venus: dec: Fix capture formats enumeration order
Jordan Crouse <jorcrous@...zon.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 05:20:18PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
[...]
>> >
>> > But regardless, I think that it would be better for a driver to
>> > not change the order of advertised VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT pixel formats.
>> >
>> > Because what happens now is that a decoding that was previously
>> > working by default is not working anymore due a combination of
>> > the default being changed and S_FMT not working as expected.
>
> For my part, I was using the gstreamer v4l2 decoder which for some reason tries
> to verify it can support whatever format it gets with G_FMT *before*
> trying a S_FMT. I can't confirm or deny if S_FMT currently works or not.
>
> That said, I entirely agree with Javier. While it might be more
> bandwidth efficient, QC08C is a obscure format. It is far more likely that the
> average open source user would rather use a well known output format and, as
> has been mentioned, once S_FMT is fixed those in the know can use the other
> formats if they are working with other Qualcomm hardware blocks.
>
Agreed. The rule is that the kernel shouldn't regress user-space and the
patches that changed the default format certainly did that. So from that
point of view I think that this patch should land.
There's also Enric's point that NV12 is a more common format and supported
by more user-space programs. That's why think that regardless of the S_FMT
situation, makes sense to revert to the previous default behaviour.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists