linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: Add quirk for platforms running Windows

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230309025212.GB18319@T480>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:52:13 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: Add quirk for platforms running Windows

+ linux-arm-msm and MSM maintainer Bjorn

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 12:53:10PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:12:21AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Commit 8fd4391ee717 ("arm64: PCI: Exclude ACPI "consumer" resources from
> > host bridge windows") introduced a check to remove host bridge register
> > resources for all arm64 platforms, with the assumption that the PNP0A03
> > _CRS resources would always be host bridge registers and never as windows
> > on arm64.
> > 
> > The assumption stands true until Qualcomm Snapdragon Windows laptops
> > emerge.  These laptops describe host bridge windows in PNP0A03 _CRS
> > resources instead.  For example, the Microsoft Surface Pro X has host
> > bridges defined as
> > 
> >     Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0A08") /* PCI Express Bus */)  // _HID: Hardware ID
> >     Name (_CID, EisaId ("PNP0A03") /* PCI Bus */)  // _CID: Compatible ID
> > 
> >     Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)  // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
> >     {
> >         Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
> >         {
> >             Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite,
> >                 0x60200000,         // Address Base
> >                 0x01DF0000,         // Address Length
> >                 )
> >             WordBusNumber (ResourceProducer, MinFixed, MaxFixed, PosDecode,
> >                 0x0000,             // Granularity
> >                 0x0000,             // Range Minimum
> >                 0x0001,             // Range Maximum
> >                 0x0000,             // Translation Offset
> >                 0x0002,             // Length
> >                 ,, )
> >         })
> >         Return (RBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0._CRS.RBUF */
> >     }
> > 
> > The Memory32Fixed holds a host bridge window, but it's not properly
> > defined as a "producer" resource.  Consequently the resource gets
> > removed by kernel, and the BAR allocation fails later on:
> > 
> >     [ 0.150731] pci 0002:00:00.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x00100000]
> >     [ 0.150744] pci 0002:00:00.0: BAR 14: failed to assign [mem size 0x00100000]
> >     [ 0.150758] pci 0002:01:00.0: BAR 0: no space for [mem size 0x00004000 64bit]
> >     [ 0.150769] pci 0002:01:00.0: BAR 0: failed to assign [mem size 0x00004000 64bit]
> > 
> > This eventually prevents the PCIe NVME drive from being accessible.
> > 
> > Add a quirk for these platforms to avoid the resource being removed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > We are running into the issue on more devices than just Surface Pro X
> > now, so trying to sort it out with a quirk as suggested by Lorenzo [1].
> 
> One thing I don't like about this application of quirks is that the
> list of affected platforms is likely to grow, which is an ongoing
> burden for users and developers.

It's a very reasonable concern.  I really hope that Qualcomm will start
thinking about Linux support on these machines in the future not too far
away, so that the list will not grow too long.

> Can we have a conversation with Qualcomm about how they *intend* this
> to work?  Linux is probably doing something wrong (interpreting
> something differently than Windows does), and if we could fix that, we
> have a better chance of future platforms working without quirks.

Today Qualcomm only ships and cares about Windows on these machines, but
I believe it will change sooner or later.

Shawn