[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c245ab8e-8801-a202-76f1-72965effe09a@ya.ru>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 22:32:46 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...ru>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, shakeelb@...gle.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, muchun.song@...ux.dev, david@...hat.com,
shy828301@...il.com, rppt@...nel.org
Cc: sultan@...neltoast.com, dave@...olabs.net,
penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp, paulmck@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mm: vmscan: hold write lock to reparent shrinker
nr_deferred
On 07.03.2023 09:56, Qi Zheng wrote:
> For now, reparent_shrinker_deferred() is the only holder
> of read lock of shrinker_rwsem. And it already holds the
> global cgroup_mutex, so it will not be called in parallel.
>
> Therefore, in order to convert shrinker_rwsem to shrinker_mutex
> later, here we change to hold the write lock of shrinker_rwsem
> to reparent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...ru>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 9a5a3da5c8b5..7aaf6f94ac1b 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> parent = root_mem_cgroup;
>
> /* Prevent from concurrent shrinker_info expand */
> - down_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> + down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> for_each_node(nid) {
> child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
> parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid);
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> atomic_long_add(nr, &parent_info->nr_deferred[i]);
> }
> }
> - up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> + up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> }
>
> static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists