[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f977a5d-8302-4a32-9dce-f6d7637b2555@t-8ch.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 23:26:44 +0000
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: don't embed integrity_kobj into gendisk
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 10:46:50PM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
> On 09. 03. 2023. 22:23, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>
> Very well, but who then destroys the cache crated here:
>
> security/integrity/iint.c:177-179
> > 177 iint_cache =
> > 178 kmem_cache_create("iint_cache", sizeof(struct integrity_iint_cache),
> > 179 0, SLAB_PANIC, init_once);
>
> I assumed that it must have been done from iint.c because iint_cache is
> static?
It doesn't seem like anything destroys this cache.
I'm not sure this is a problem though as iint.c can not be built as module.
At least it's not a problem with kobjects as those are not used here.
> BTW, moving check for !ktype->release to kobject_init() is great for it
> might make such problems noticed in dmesg, rather than taking screenshots.
>
> Regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists