linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] arm64: tegra: Add GTE nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7b269c9f-803e-69d6-9416-1620e1726e7e@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 07:15:36 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        timestamp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] arm64: tegra: Add GTE nodes

On 08/03/2023 21:13, Dipen Patel wrote:
> On 2/16/23 6:18 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14/02/2023 12:55, Dipen Patel wrote:
>>> Add GTE nodes for the tegra234. Also modify AON GTE nodes for the
>>> tegra194 to remove nvidia,slice property and add nvidia,gpio-controller
>>> propertyto specify AON GPIO controller node so that GTE driver can
>>> do namespace conversion between GPIO lines provided by the gpiolib
>>> framework and hardware timestamping engine subsystem.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi |  3 +--
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
>>> index 4afcbd60e144..4c92850b1ec4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
>>> @@ -1363,7 +1363,6 @@
>>>  			reg = <0x3aa0000 0x10000>;
>>>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>  			nvidia,int-threshold = <1>;
>>> -			nvidia,slices = <11>;
>>>  			#timestamp-cells = <1>;
>>>  			status = "okay";
>>>  		};
>>> @@ -1586,7 +1585,7 @@
>>>  			reg = <0xc1e0000 0x10000>;
>>>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>  			nvidia,int-threshold = <1>;
>>> -			nvidia,slices = <3>;
>>> +			nvidia,gpio-controller = <&gpio_aon>;
>>>  			#timestamp-cells = <1>;
>>>  			status = "okay";
>>>  		};
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
>>> index eaf05ee9acd1..4a87490c5fd4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
>>> @@ -1086,6 +1086,15 @@
>>>  			clock-names = "fuse";
>>>  		};
>>>  
>>> +		hte_lic: hardware-timestamp@...0000 {
>>> +			compatible = "nvidia,tegra234-gte-lic";
>>> +			reg = <0x3aa0000 0x10000>;
>>> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> +			nvidia,int-threshold = <1>;
>>> +			#timestamp-cells = <1>;
>>> +			status = "okay";
>>
>> Why do you need status? It's okay by default.
> what's harm of having to explicitly mentioned? 

Because useless code is not helping any review. We do not add other
useless properties, or shall we add them?

>I can see status = okay in this dtsi file
> for other nodes as well and was just following that.

So if you see a bug somewhere, you also duplicate it in your code?


Best regards,
Krzysztof