[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <783fe50c-1649-b1c4-06cd-ac81bcad5117@starfivetech.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:13:46 +0800
From: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: Add watchdog for StarFive
JH7100 and JH7110
On 2023/3/9 15:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/03/2023 04:40, Xingyu Wu wrote:
>> Add bindings to describe the watchdog for the StarFive JH7100/JH7110 SoC.
>> And Use JH7100 as first StarFive SoC with watchdog.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>
>> ---
>
> What happened here? You wrote in changelog "Modified" but what exactly?
> How am I supposed to find it?
>
> Provide detailed description, since you decided to remove my tag.
> Otherwise, standard response:
>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
> tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
> version they apply.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
I am sorry I did not elaborate it. The dt-bindings was only supported JH7110 watchdog in v3 patchset
and you had sent Reviewed-by tags. But at the same time tried to add JH7100 watchdog after discussion
and used JH7100 as the dt-binding's name because JH7100 is the first StarFive SoCs about watchdog.
The compatible also add 'starfive,jh7100-wdt' in the dt-binding. It is different from the v3 patch and
I did not add the Reviewed-by tag.
Best regards,
Xingyu Wu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists