[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37f821b8-f681-08e4-d4f1-d37be191ff7f@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:12:24 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, u-boot@...ts.denx.de,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nvmem: core: allow nvmem_cell_post_process_t
callbacks to adjust buffer
On 22/02/2023 17:22, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> @@ -1791,11 +1792,15 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> if (!nvmem)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* Cells with read_post_process hook may realloc buffer we can't allow here */
> + if (info->read_post_process)
> + return -EINVAL;
This should probably go in 1/4 patch. Other than that series looks good
to me.
--srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists