[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05058013-0e9d-5422-2e1b-184fffe96503@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 11:34:13 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
perex@...ex.cz, broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com, bgoswami@...cinc.com,
andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tiwai@...e.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, quic_jackp@...cinc.com,
quic_plai@...cinc.com,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] xhci: Add support to allocate several
interrupters
On 09.03.23 00:57, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> @@ -1865,8 +1889,15 @@ void xhci_mem_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
>
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&xhci->cmd_timer);
>
> - xhci_free_interrupter(xhci, xhci->interrupter);
> - xhci->interrupter = NULL;
> + for (i = 1; i < xhci->max_interrupters; i++) {
> + if (xhci->interrupters[i])
> + xhci_remove_secondary_interrupter(xhci_to_hcd(xhci),
> + xhci->interrupters[i]);
> + }
> +
> + /* free the primary interrupter, interrupter number 0 */
> + xhci_free_interrupter(xhci, xhci->interrupters[0]);
> + xhci->interrupters[0] = NULL;
> xhci_dbg_trace(xhci, trace_xhci_dbg_init, "Freed primary event ring");
Any reason you are not just counting down to zero?
> + if (idx > 0) {
> + ir = xhci_alloc_interrupter(xhci, idx, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ir) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
Why use _irqrestore?
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists