[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230309104813.170309-1-jingyuwang_vip@163.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 18:48:13 +0800
From: Jingyu Wang <jingyuwang_vip@....com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jingyu Wang <jingyuwang_vip@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/gup.c: fix typo in comments
Signed-off-by: Jingyu Wang <jingyuwang_vip@....com>
---
mm/gup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index eab18ba045db..1f72a717232b 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ static bool is_valid_gup_args(struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas,
* This does not guarantee that the page exists in the user mappings when
* get_user_pages_remote returns, and there may even be a completely different
* page there in some cases (eg. if mmapped pagecache has been invalidated
- * and subsequently re faulted). However it does guarantee that the page
+ * and subsequently re-faulted). However it does guarantee that the page
* won't be freed completely. And mostly callers simply care that the page
* contains data that was valid *at some point in time*. Typically, an IO
* or similar operation cannot guarantee anything stronger anyway because
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists