linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3 00/11] SEV: Cleanup sev-guest a bit and add throttling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230309121207.GBZAnNF+lJmoqPlazP@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:12:07 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
        Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>,
        Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 00/11] SEV: Cleanup sev-guest a bit and add throttling

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 02:33:58PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> One thing I noticed is that patch #3 fixes an issue where the fw_err field
> returns uninitialized stack data when success (0) is returned by the
> ioctl(). There's no Fixes: tag on that commit. But I guess the later Fixes:
> tag on patch #9 would cause #3 to be pulled, too, right?

Yeah, that's the plan...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette