[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230309130700.GH7501@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 15:07:00 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] serial: core: Start managing serial controllers
to enable runtime PM
* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> [230309 12:23]:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 10:57:08AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > + err = pm_runtime_get(port_dev);
>
> Is not sync API a deliberate choice? Do we need to comment on why is so?
I don't think it can be sync version.. See where all __uart_start() may
get called from. The pm_runtime_get() here is needed so the check for
pm_runtime_active() won't be racy. Maybe we can now leave out the
"start TX anyways" part though.
Thanks for your other comments too, will fix up those for the next
revision.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists