[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7e72552-d4ec-46f2-4f45-d8baec914ff1@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:45:36 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] n_tty: Reindent if condition
On 09. 03. 23, 9:20, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Align if condition to make it easier to read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> index 0481e57077f1..1c9e5d2ea7de 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ static void n_tty_receive_overrun(struct tty_struct *tty)
>
> ldata->num_overrun++;
> if (time_after(jiffies, ldata->overrun_time + HZ) ||
> - time_after(ldata->overrun_time, jiffies)) {
> + time_after(ldata->overrun_time, jiffies)) {
Staring at this, what the second time_after() does in the first place?
> tty_warn(tty, "%d input overrun(s)\n", ldata->num_overrun);
> ldata->overrun_time = jiffies;
> ldata->num_overrun = 0;
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists