linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] Revert "dt-bindings: mmc: Add bindings for Intel Thunder Bay SoC"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ef2f8faf-76cc-d221-8281-cc7b8cb68485@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:12:55 +0200
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, rashmi.a@...el.com,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kishon@...com, vkoul@...nel.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     kris.pan@...ux.intel.com, mahesh.r.vaidya@...el.com,
        nandhini.srikandan@...el.com, vasavi.v.itha@...el.com,
        kenchappa.demakkanavar@...el.com, furong.zhou@...el.com,
        mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] Revert "dt-bindings: mmc: Add bindings for Intel
 Thunder Bay SoC"

On 24/01/23 13:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/01/2023 06:44, rashmi.a@...el.com wrote:
>> From: "A, Rashmi" <rashmi.a@...el.com>
>>
>> This reverts commit ab991c05c42853f0b6110022db9bf30fcc6323dd.
> 
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> 
>>
>> Revert Thunder Bay specific code as the product got cancelled
>> and there are no end customers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: A, Rashmi <rashmi.a@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@...el.com>wq
> 
> Stray characters.
> 
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml | 25 -------------------
>>  1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml
>> index 4053de758db6..0d5d21dd30bb 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml
>> @@ -88,12 +88,6 @@ properties:
>>          description:
>>            For this device it is strongly suggested to include
>>            arasan,soc-ctl-syscon.
>> -      - items:
>> -          - const: intel,thunderbay-sdhci-5.1   # Intel Thunder Bay eMMC PHY
>> -          - const: arasan,sdhci-5.1
> 
> Instead should be made rather deprecated, unless you are sure there is
> no single person in the world using the bindings (e.g. with BSD or
> bootloader)?

I am sorry but this is not clear to me.  As I understand it,
the hardware was never released, so the binding serves no
purpose.  Should it be removed or "deprecated"?