[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230310231206.3952808-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:12:01 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com, jack@...e.com,
jaharkes@...cmu.edu, coda@...cmu.edu, codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu,
anton@...era.com, linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com,
j.granados@...sung.com, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] misc filesystems: simplify sysctl registration
This simplifies syctl registration for a few misc filesystems according
to our latest preference / guidance [0]. register_sysctl_table() incurs
possible recursion and we can avoid that by dealing with flat
directories with files in them, and having the subdirectories explicitly
named with register_sysctl().
As we phase these callers out we can deprecate / remove register_sysctl_table()
eventually.
If you're a maintainer feel free to pick up the patch or I'm also happy
to take it through sysctl-next if you like. These don't create
conflicts so there is no requirement they go throug sysclt-next at all.
I can pick up stragglers later.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230310223947.3917711-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/T/#u
Luis Chamberlain (5):
fs/cachefiles: simplify one-level sysctl registration for
cachefiles_sysctls
devpts: simplify two-level sysctl registration for pty_kern_table
quota: simplify two-level sysctl registration for fs_dqstats_table
coda: simplify one-level sysctl registration for coda_table
ntfs: simplfy one-level sysctl registration for ntfs_sysctls
fs/cachefiles/error_inject.c | 11 +----------
fs/coda/sysctl.c | 11 +----------
fs/devpts/inode.c | 20 +-------------------
fs/ntfs/sysctl.c | 12 +-----------
fs/quota/dquot.c | 20 +-------------------
5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
--
2.39.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists