[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAu/dHzS+ZcLfOHY@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:38:28 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"farman@...ux.ibm.com" <farman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] vfio: Support IO page table replacement
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:53:56AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 10:26 PM
> >
> > Now both the physical path and the emulated path should support an IO
> > page
> > table replacement.
> >
> > Call iommufd_device_replace() when vdev->iommufd_attached is true.
> >
>
> why is replace enabled only in physical path in this patch?
The emulated pathway does not call iommufd_device_attach() but
iommufd_access_set_ioas() in the other patch, which internally
takes care of the replacement for the access pointer.
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists