[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAq/n4PNeow6wftN@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 21:26:55 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yi.l.liu@...el.com" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] iommufd: Add nesting related data structures
for ARM SMMUv3
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 04:07:54PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgg@...dia.com]
> > Sent: 09 March 2023 16:00
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
> > Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>; Nicolin Chen
> > <nicolinc@...dia.com>; robin.murphy@....com; will@...nel.org;
> > eric.auger@...hat.com; kevin.tian@...el.com; baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com;
> > joro@...tes.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > iommu@...ts.linux.dev; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; yi.l.liu@...el.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] iommufd: Add nesting related data structures
> > for ARM SMMUv3
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 03:51:42PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > For ARM cases where there is no shared VMID space with KVM, the ARM
> > > > VMID should be somehow assigned to the iommfd_ctx itself and the alloc
> > > > domain op should receive it from there.
> > >
> > > Is there any use of VMID outside SMMUv3? I was thinking if nested domain
> > alloc
> > > doesn't provide the KVM instance, then SMMUv3 can use its internal VMID.
> >
> > When we talk about exposing an SMMUv3 IOMMU CMDQ directly to
> > userspace then
> > VMID is the security token that protects it.
> >
> > So in that environment every domain under the same iommufd should
> > share the same VMID so that the CMDQ's also share the same VMID.
> >
> > I expect this to be a common sort of requirement as we will see
> > userspace command queues in the other HW as well.
> >
> > So, I suppose the answer for now is that ARM SMMUv3 should just
> > allocate one VMID per iommu_domain and there should be no VMID in the
> > uapi at all.
> >
> > Moving all iommu_domains to share the same VMID is a future patch.
> >
> > Though.. I have no idea how vVMID is handled in the SMMUv3
> > architecture. I suppose the guest IOMMU HW caps are set in a way that
> > it knows it does not have VMID?
>
> I think, Guest only sets up the SMMUv3 S1 stage and it doesn't use VMID.
Yea, a vmid is only allocated in an S2 domain allocation. So,
a guest allocating only S1 domains always sets VMID=0. Yet, I
think that the hypervisor or some where in host kernel should
replace the VMID=0 with a unified VMID.
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists