[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <037d7f13866e03dd2cc0dd4307479fa9a7498b19.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:33:13 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] LoongArch: Provide kernel fpu functions
On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 14:33 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> We should probably provide more archaeology or legal evidence as to why
> the in-kernel FPU ops must be GPL-only. After all the status quo is that
> among all arches that provide such ops, only the x86 ones are exported
> GPL, so if loongarch should go GPL for this interface then probably
> everyone else should too. It's not only affecting loongarch IMO.
If it's forced by GPL we should change the other arch's similar function
to EXPORT_GPL immediately.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists