[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc97cfe5-e90a-d901-147a-2bb829a4409d@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 09:14:56 +0000
From: <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To: <chengziqiu@...t.edu.cn>, <eugen.hristev@...labora.com>,
<jic23@...nel.org>, <lars@...afoo.de>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: iio: remove dead code in at91_adc_probe
On 09.03.2023 17:05, Cheng Ziqiu wrote:
>>From the comment of platform_get_irq, it only returns non-zero IRQ
> number and negative error number, other than zero.
>
> Fix this by removing the if condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cheng Ziqiu <chengziqiu@...t.edu.cn>
I see From and 1st SoB matches but
> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>
this SoB seems extra. What is the contribution of Dongliang Mu to this patch?
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> index 50d02e5fc6fc..168399092590 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> @@ -2400,12 +2400,8 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> st->dma_st.phys_addr = res->start;
>
> st->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (st->irq <= 0) {
> - if (!st->irq)
> - st->irq = -ENXIO;
> -
> + if (st->irq < 0)
> return st->irq;
> - }
>
> st->per_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "adc_clk");
> if (IS_ERR(st->per_clk))
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists