[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9413338-7f33-8fd7-11cf-17a9b31aba57@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:37:42 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add the Inline Crypto Engine
nodes
On 10/03/2023 10:34, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>> I assume you mean it breaks if someone is using old approach DTS with a
>>> kernel that would have ICE driver merged. Yes, that it does. And for
>>> that, in the v3, I'll make of_qcom_ice_get check if there is a reg entry
>>> with name "ice" and create an ICE instance but for the same dev as the
>>> consumer driver. OTOH, if there is no reg entry called "ice", it will
>>> look up a device based on phande of qcom,ice property. This will allow
>>> legacy style DTS to work fine, while using the unified driver as a
>>> library, in that case. For newer platforms, the recommended approach
>>> will be to add a new ICE node and use qcom,ice property.
>>
>> For the driver this sounds good. I still think that existing (older) DTS
>> should not have regs removed, because this affects other users of kernel
>> DTS.
>
> Yes, that's what I meant, the already supported platforms will remain
> with ice reg in the consumer node.
... unless you plan to add to them UFS ICE, which would be nice feature
thus justifying DTS re-shuffle :)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists