linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] ocfs2: convert to use i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <faca55dc-fe0d-9014-ede2-f55124cb4227@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2023 19:13:09 +0800
From:   Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
        huyue2@...lpad.com, jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com, tytso@....edu,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, rpeterso@...hat.com, agruenba@...hat.com,
        mark@...heh.com, jlbec@...lplan.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        brauner@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] ocfs2: convert to use i_blockmask()



On 3/10/23 1:48 PM, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Use i_blockmask() to simplify code. BTW convert ocfs2_is_io_unaligned
> to return bool type and the fact that the value will be the same
> (i.e. that ->i_blkbits is never changed by ocfs2).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/file.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> index efb09de4343d..7fd06a4d27d4 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -2159,14 +2159,9 @@ int ocfs2_check_range_for_refcount(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int ocfs2_is_io_unaligned(struct inode *inode, size_t count, loff_t pos)
> +static bool ocfs2_is_io_unaligned(struct inode *inode, size_t count, loff_t pos)
>  {
> -	int blockmask = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize - 1;
> -	loff_t final_size = pos + count;
> -
> -	if ((pos & blockmask) || (final_size & blockmask))
> -		return 1;
> -	return 0;
> +	return ((pos | count) & i_blockmask(inode)) != 0;

Or !!((pos | count) & i_blockmask(inode))?

My concern is just like erofs, we'd better get vfs helper into mainline
first. Or can we fold the whole series into one patch? Since it's simple
enough I think.

Thanks,
Joseph

>  }
>  
>  static int ocfs2_inode_lock_for_extent_tree(struct inode *inode,