[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAs81tPqVruM4eAL@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:21:10 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regmap: cache: Do not panic for REGCACHE_NONE regmap
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. März 2023, 14:02:13 CET schrieb Mark Brown:
> > Why would we be trying to do a regcache_sync() on a device with
> > no cache?
> Indeed, that makes no sense. That's indicating a bug in a driver, but why do
> we need to panic the kernel in this case?
You're trying to change this to silently ignore the call which
isn't going to make anything happy.
> On the other hand the same question applies to other regcache related
> functions currently checking for non-cached maps. There is no common
> behaviour:
> panic:
> * regcache_sync
> * regcache_sync_region
These are only ever triggered from a client driver, nothing in
regmap will ever sync the regmap without being explicitly asked
to.
> returning -ENOSYS:
> * regcache_read
> returning success (0):
> * regcache_write
> early return (void return value):
> * regcache_exit
These are all called transparently as part of the regmap core
regardless of if there is a cache, users never directly read or
write values to the cache.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists