[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230310144736.1546972-1-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:35 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: st: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
---
drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
index a3268d95a50e..50ef40671652 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int st_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_set_rate(ddata->clk, ddata->clk_rate);
}
- if (of_get_property(np, "mbox-names", NULL)) {
+ if (of_property_present(np, "mbox-names")) {
ddata->mbox_client_vq0.dev = dev;
ddata->mbox_client_vq0.tx_done = NULL;
ddata->mbox_client_vq0.tx_block = false;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists