[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAtHQuhWz+q//pE2@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:05:38 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hui Wang <hw.huiwang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] perf : fix counting when initial delay configured
Em Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:37:14AM +0800, Changbin Du escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 05:40:16PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:22:37AM -0800, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 7:12 PM Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The first one fixes the problem that counters are never enabled when initial
> > > > delay configured.
> > > > The remaining two reuse the common field target::initial_delay for
> > > > record/ftrace/trace subcommands.
> > > >
> > > > v2:
> > > > - introduce common filed target::initial_delay
> > > >
> > > > Changbin Du (3):
> > > > perf stat: fix counting when initial delay configured
> > > > perf record: reuse target::initial_delay
> > > > perf: ftrace: reuse target::initial_delay
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> >
> > Thanks, applying the first to perf-tools (old perf/urgent) and the rest
> > to perf-tools-next (old perf/core).
> >
> > - Arnaldo
> >
> Hi Arnaldo, it seems only the first one is applied. The remaining two patches
> are missed in your tree.
> - perf record: reuse target::initial_delay
> - perf: ftrace: reuse target::initial_delay
Those are not fixes, right? I mentioned that I would apply it after the
first is merged.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists