[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230311002258.852397-11-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:22:41 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/27] drm/i915/gvt: Protect gfn hash table with vgpu_lock
Use vgpu_lock instead of KVM's mmu_lock to protect accesses to the hash
table used to track which gfns are write-protected when shadowing the
guest's GTT, and hoist the acquisition of vgpu_lock from
intel_vgpu_page_track_handler() out to its sole caller,
kvmgt_page_track_write().
This fixes a bug where kvmgt_page_track_write(), which doesn't hold
kvm->mmu_lock, could race with intel_gvt_page_track_remove() and trigger
a use-after-free.
Fixing kvmgt_page_track_write() by taking kvm->mmu_lock is not an option
as mmu_lock is a r/w spinlock, and intel_vgpu_page_track_handler() might
sleep when acquiring vgpu->cache_lock deep down the callstack:
intel_vgpu_page_track_handler()
|
|-> page_track->handler / ppgtt_write_protection_handler()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_write_page_table_bytes()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_write_page_table()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_entry_removal()
|
|-> ppgtt_invalidate_pte()
|
|-> intel_gvt_dma_unmap_guest_page()
|
|-> mutex_lock(&vgpu->cache_lock);
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 55 +++++++++++++++------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c | 10 +----
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 68be66395598..9824d075562e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -366,6 +366,8 @@ __kvmgt_protect_table_find(struct intel_vgpu *info, gfn_t gfn)
{
struct kvmgt_pgfn *p, *res = NULL;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&info->vgpu_lock);
+
hash_for_each_possible(info->ptable, p, hnode, gfn) {
if (gfn == p->gfn) {
res = p;
@@ -1567,6 +1569,9 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, info->status))
return -ESRCH;
+ if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
+ return 0;
+
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
if (!slot) {
@@ -1575,16 +1580,12 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
}
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
- if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
- goto out;
-
kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+
kvmgt_protect_table_add(info, gfn);
-
-out:
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
return 0;
}
@@ -1597,24 +1598,22 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_remove(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, info->status))
return -ESRCH;
- idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
- slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
- if (!slot) {
- srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
if (!kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
- goto out;
+ return 0;
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+ slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
+ if (!slot) {
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+
kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
-
-out:
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
return 0;
}
@@ -1625,9 +1624,13 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
struct intel_vgpu *info =
container_of(node, struct intel_vgpu, track_node);
+ mutex_lock(&info->vgpu_lock);
+
if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gpa_to_gfn(gpa)))
intel_vgpu_page_track_handler(info, gpa,
(void *)val, len);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
}
static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -1639,16 +1642,20 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
struct intel_vgpu *info =
container_of(node, struct intel_vgpu, track_node);
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&info->vgpu_lock);
+
for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn)) {
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn,
KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
}
}
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
}
void intel_vgpu_detach_regions(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c
index df34e73cba41..60a65435556d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c
@@ -162,13 +162,9 @@ int intel_vgpu_page_track_handler(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, u64 gpa,
struct intel_vgpu_page_track *page_track;
int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(&vgpu->vgpu_lock);
-
page_track = intel_vgpu_find_page_track(vgpu, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (!page_track) {
- ret = -ENXIO;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (!page_track)
+ return -ENXIO;
if (unlikely(vgpu->failsafe)) {
/* Remove write protection to prevent furture traps. */
@@ -179,7 +175,5 @@ int intel_vgpu_page_track_handler(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, u64 gpa,
gvt_err("guest page write error, gpa %llx\n", gpa);
}
-out:
- mutex_unlock(&vgpu->vgpu_lock);
return ret;
}
--
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists