[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f448bc9-2f2b-77cb-ffe2-895593a6047e@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 13:28:17 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Robert Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] iio: light: max44009: add missing OF device matching
On 11/03/2023 13:26, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:14:56 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> The driver currently matches only via i2c_device_id, but also has
>> of_device_id table:
>>
>> drivers/iio/light/max44009.c:545:34: error: ‘max44009_of_match’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>>
>> Fixes: 6aef699a7d7e ("iio: light: add driver for MAX44009")
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Don't use of_match_ptr() unless you are absolutely sure no other firmware
> route will make use of the of_match_table.
>
> In this particular case ACPI using PRP0001 is broken by that macro.
It's not broken because there was no matching via PRP0001 due to missing
table.
>
> So good to set the of_match_table, but make sure to always set it
> and hence you don't need the __maybe_unused.
So you want to add PRP0001? We can, the fix is for different issue, though.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists