[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c66c3f92-fa33-5af1-6f19-79b6d3530862@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 13:30:01 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Robert Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: proximity: sx9500: Mark ACPI and OF related data
as maybe unused
On 11/03/2023 13:28, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:14:57 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> The driver can be compile tested with !CONFIG_OF or !CONFIG_ACPI making
>> certain data unused:
>>
>> drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c:1039:34: error: ‘sx9500_of_match’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Hi Krysztof
>
> Thanks for looking at these warnings.
>
> Drop the protection macros instead. The tables are trivial in size and
> the of_match_ptr() breaks some ways this driver can be used.
> ACPI_PTR() isn't as bad, but is pretty much pointless given this size of
> the array.
>
For ACPI platform, ACPI table is used, so nothing for PRP0001. For OF
platform, OF table is used.
What usage exactly is broken here? What ways?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists