linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: qlge: Remove parenthesis around single condition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2023 17:09:37 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:     Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@...il.com>
Cc:     outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, manishc@...vell.com,
        GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, coiby.xu@...il.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: qlge: Remove parenthesis around single condition

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 06:04:09AM -0800, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> At line #354 checkpatch.pl:
> CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'i == 0x00000114'
> CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'i == 0x00000118'
> CHECK: Unnecessary parenthesis around 'i == 0x00000140'
> CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'i == 0x0000013c'
> 

Greg likes the extra parentheses so don't bother sending these sorts of
patches to staging.

> Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c
> index 66d28358342f..b190a2993033 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c
> @@ -351,10 +351,10 @@ static int qlge_get_xgmac_regs(struct qlge_adapter *qdev, u32 *buf,
>  		/* We're reading 400 xgmac registers, but we filter out
>  		 * several locations that are non-responsive to reads.
>  		 */
> -		if ((i == 0x00000114) ||
> -		    (i == 0x00000118) ||
> -			(i == 0x0000013c) ||
> -			(i == 0x00000140) ||
> +		if (i == 0x00000114 ||
> +		    i == 0x00000118 ||
> +			i == 0x0000013c ||
> +			i == 0x00000140 ||

The weirder thing about this code is the indenting.  It should be:
[tab][tab][space][space][space][space](i ==.

regards,
dan carpenter