[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8affe7aa-55d3-4e96-b39a-99049ca8cd84@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 15:53:50 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: re-order functions
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 10:41:40AM +0100, Klaus Kudielka wrote:
> Move mv88e6xxx_setup() below mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(), so that we are
> able to call the latter one from here. Do the same thing for the
> inverse functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>
Hi Klaus
If this your first patchset for netdev? There are a few process issues
you missed. Please take a look at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
This patchset if for net-next, so the subject should indicate that.
It is also normal to include a patch 0/X which explains the big
picture. Part of the commit message you have in patch 2/2 would then
appear in 0/2.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists